Wednesday, August 7, 2019
Johann Andreas Eisenmenger - POSED AS A RIGHTEOUS JEWISH CONVERT, THEN WROTE AN ANTISEMITIC CREED
— “Eisenmenger belonged to the class of insects which sucks poison even out of flowers,” the 19th-century Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz wrote.
Wednesday, July 24, 2019
Saturday, July 6, 2019
Islamic Schoolbooks Teach ... - reference.
https://www.memri.org/reports/indian-islamic-schoolbooks-teach-hate-against-polytheists-and-unbelievers
The following are some questions and answers relating to non-Muslims from part 2 of Noorani Talim.
"Q. What do you call someone who associates someone equal to or partner with Allah?
"A. We call them Mushrik [polytheist] and Kafir [unbeliever]
"Q. What is wrong in being a Kafir or Mushrik?
"A. Allah will always be unhappy with a Kafir or Mushrik and after death they will remain in the fire or hell forever.
"Q. Will Kafirs or Mushriks never go to paradise?
"A. No, never, they will remain in hell for eternity.
"Q. How is it known that Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam is the Prophet of Allah Ta'ala?
"A. It is proven by the fact that, our Holy Prophet called people towards Islam, he performed many miracles and he gave such knowledge of the unseen (Ilm-e-Ghaib) which can only be given by none other than a Prophet of Allah.
"Q. What do you call a person who does not believe in Muhammad Mustapha Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam as a Prophet?
"A. He/She is a Kafir
"Q. What if someone believes in Allah Ta'ala but does not believe in the Holy Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam?
"A. The person is also a Kafir."
The following are some questions and answers from part 3 of Noorani Talim.
"Q. What is 'Kufr'?
"A. To disbelieve in any of the things that are compulsory to believe in Islam.
"Q. Who was the last Prophet?
"A. Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa (peace be on him).
"Q. Are there going to be any Nabis [prophets] now?
"A. There will be no Nabi now. This is because our holy Prophet (peace be on him) is the seal of the prophets. If a person doubts this, then he is a Kafir.
"Q. If a person prays Namaz [i.e., the five daily prayers in Islam], fasts, etc. and believes everything of Iman-Mufassal [complete faith] but is insulting and be rude to the Prophet (peace be on him). Is this person a Muslim?
"A. No! Such a person is a Kafir and murtad [apostate].
"Q. If a person does not insult the Prophet but purposely believes that those who insult the Prophet are Muslims. Is such a person regarded as a Muslim?
"A. No! This person too is a Kafir and murtad."
The following are some questions and answers from part 4 of Noorani Talim.
"Q. It is not possible that humans, animals and mountains just evolved by themselves?
"A. No, this is impossible because we can see for ourselves that the tiniest things such as pens and pencils cannot make themselves, then how can the Earth and Sky and other big things come into being all by themselves.
"Q. If a Muslim says that Allah is nothing and says that the earth and sky just came into being and were not created by Allah, what is the ruling on this?
"A. Whoever says this has stepped outside the folds of Islam and is deemed a Kafir.
"Q. What is the Islamic ruling of someone who speaks badly of Allah?
"A. It is an act of Kufr [unbelief] to speak or think of Allah in this way.
"Q. What is Jannat [heaven] made of?
"A. The walls of Jannat are constructed from bricks made of gold and silver and are laid in alternate position i.e. one gold, one silver, one gold etc. The cement is made from sweet smelling musk and the stones are of pearls and diamonds.
"Q. Can you explain other qualities of Jannat?
"A. There are many qualities of Jannat which cannot even be explained, out of which here are some:
"i) Jannat has oceans of water, milk and honey. The streams of these oceans will go up to the Jannatees [residents of paradise] houses and will be sweet smelling.
"ii) The women of Jannat are so beautiful that is one was to be shown in this world, from the earth to the skies would be brightened. Their bangles are so shiny that the sun's rays would disappear like the stars with the sun's rays.
"iii) When the Jannatees will eat and drink but they will not perform excretion or urine, they will also be clean from saliva and mucus. Their sweat will be sweet smelling. Their food will be completely digested.
"iv) The Jannatees will have all kind of fruit and food. If one desired to eat some meat that would be presented to them straight away. If they desired to drink something that would be there straight away in a glass.
"v) If the Jannatees wanted to meet with each other they would straight away be presented in from of the guests. Their carriage would get to their destination straight away.
"vi) Jannatees will always stay healthy and free from illness. They will never become ill, they will always remain alive, they will always remain young and never grow old. They always remain in luxury and never face difficulties.
"vii) The Jannatees from the lower grades will have Eighty Thousand servants and seventy-two wives.
"Q. What is Dozakh [Hell]?
"A. Dozakh is a place made for Kafirs, wrong sects, and sinful Muslims and is made of fire.
"Q. What is the fire of hell like?
"A. The fire of hell was fired up for a thousand years then it went red, it was then heated for another thousand years and it went white then for another thousand years it was heated and it went black. It is now completely black with no light whatsoever.
"Q. Is there any light in Hell?
"A. No, Dozakh is completely dark.
"Q. How hot is the fire of Dozakh?
"A. The fire of Dozakh is seventy times hotter than fire in this world.
"Q. How deep is Dozakh?
"A. Only Allah knows how deep it is, but it is quoted in the Hadith Sharif that if a stone was thrown inside it after seventy years it would still not hit the bottom.
"Q. What food and drink will be given to the Dozakhees [residents of hell]?
"A. The puss that will come out of the Dozakhees will be given to them to drink and to eat they will be given a fruit with thorns which if a part of it comes into the world with its heat and bad smell the whole world would suffer. However, the Dozakhees will eat it without any choice and it will get stuck in their throats. To obtain relief from this they will ask for water and will be given boiling hot oil to drink, which after drinking their insides will burn out.
"Q. Can you explain some other details of Dozakh?
"A. i) There is fire in the hell is every direction and everything is made from fire of Dozakh is so strong that if a pin-point of it was thrown into this world everything would die with its heat. Also if one link from the chains of the Dozakhees was to be put on top of the mountain, the mountain would shake and the link would sink in.
"ii) The face of the guard of Dozakh is so scary that if it was seen on earth all the people would die of fright.
"iii) In hell there will be snakes the size of large camels and scorpions the size of large donkeys whose bit sting would have the painful effect of up to forty years.
"iv) The last punishment given to the less sinful is that they will be shoes of fire to wear, which with the heat will boil the wearer's brain and his head will blow open like a pan's cover blows open.
"Q. What is the order for those who do not believe in Jannat or Dozakh?
"A. The one does not believe in Jannat or Dozakh is an Infidel (Kafir)."
The following are some questions and answers from part 5 of Noorani Talim.
"Q. What is known as Gunaah-e-Kabira?
"A. Extremely large sins are considered Gunaah-e-Kabira. The main ones include polytheism, infidelity, adultery, theft, alcohol consumption, telling lies, back-biting, telling tales, not praying Namaz, not fasting in the month of Ramadan, and not giving Zakat [alms].
"Q. If one does not perform Gunaah-e-Kabira then will he not remain a Muslim?
"A. Those who perform Shirk [polytheism] or Kufr does not remain a Muslim, he then becomes a Mushrik or Kafir. As for the rest of the Kabira Gunaahs [large sins] one does stay a Muslim if he commits these sins, a very disobedient Muslim is known as 'Faasiq.'
"Q. What is known as Shirk?
"A. To partner or treat as equal something or someone with Allah or Allah's characteristic is considered shirk.
"Q. What is meant by to partner with something with Allah?
"A. To Partner with Allah is to believe in more than one Allah, like the Christians have three Gods, this is the reason why they are Mushriks. The Hindu faith is associated with many gods, they are also defined as Mushriks.
"Q. What is Kufr?
"A. To reject any fact of Zaruriyaat-e-Deen [compulsory beliefs or religion]."
Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Saudi Twitter Poll Finds 33% In Favor Of Relations With Israel, Versus 47% Against
Sukina Al-Meshekhis's Twitter Poll
The
poll set up by Saudi journalist Sukina Al-Meshekhis, who resides in the Emirati
city of Dubai and writes a column in the Saudi daily Al-Yawm, asked: "Do
you support Gulf countries maintaining good relations with Israel and treating
it as [just another] country in the Middle East?" Despite being active for
only 24 hours, it elicited 5,342 responses, with 33% voting in favor of
relations with Israel, 47% voting against, and 20% choosing to "wait for
the results [of the poll]."
Monday, June 3, 2019
12,000 Palestinians Fought for U.K. in WWII Alongside Jewish Volunteers, Historian Finds
Sparking an
uproar in 2015, Netanyahu argued prominent Palestinian leader 'played an
important role' in Hitler's plan to annihilate the Jews, but Prof. Mustafa
Abbasi says Palestinians were 'not at all' looking to aid the Nazis
Arab
rookies line up in a barracks square for their first drill under a British
soldier, in Mandatory Palestine, December 1940
Sparking an
uproar in 2015, Netanyahu argued prominent Palestinian leader 'played an
important role' in Hitler's plan to annihilate the Jews, but Prof. Mustafa
Abbasi says Palestinians were 'not at all' looking to aid the Nazis
In 2015,
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked an uproar when he claimed that Mufti
Haj Amin al-Husseini was the one who’d urged Hitler to annihilate the Jews. In
the wake of the criticism this elicited, Netanyahu said his intention was not
to absolve Hitler of responsibility for the Holocaust, but to note that “the
Mufti played an important role in the Final Solution.”
But it
turns out that there was another side to the story that also escaped mention by Netanyahu,
the historian’s son:
the forgotten role played by thousands of Palestinians who did not heed the Mufti of
Jerusalem’s call to support the Axis countries, and went so far as
to take up arms to fight the Nazis, often shoulder to shoulder with young
Jews from Mandatory Palestine.
Professor
Mustafa Abbasi, a historian at Tel Hai Academic College, has spent years
tracing their story. Having recently published an academic article on the
subject, this week he suggested an opposite narrative to the one that Netanyahu put
forward. The prime minister had sought to paint the Palestinians as
supporters of the Third Reich, but Abbasi says, “The Mufti did not find a
receptive audience among the Palestinians for his call to aid the Nazis. Not at
all.”
The subject of Abbasi’s research
is unusual. Many studies have been published about Jewish volunteerism in the
war against the Nazis, which reached a peak with the formation of the Jewish
Brigade. But “the thousands of Arab volunteers are hardly mentioned and
sometimes the record is often distorted,” Abbasi says.
In
an article in the latest issue of the periodical Cathedra (“Palestinians
Fighting the Nazis: The Story of Palestinian Volunteers in World War II”), he
explains why these Palestinian fighters have been left out of the history
books.
On the one hand, Zionist historians
naturally placed an emphasis on the role played by Jewish volunteers in the
fight against the Nazis. On the other hand, their Palestinian counterparts were
focusing on the struggle against British rule and were not eager to glorify the
names of those who cooperated with Britain not so many years after the British
put down the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939, and thereby indirectly helped the Jews
establish a state.
“Neither side
wished to highlight this subject,” says Professor Abbasi. “But I think it’s the
historian’s job to be faithful to the sources and to try to describe history as
it was, without being hostage to any national narrative that would limit him
and prevent him from writing history freely.”
One has to wonder
why no organization was ever established to commemorate the actions of these
Palestinian volunteers. “Many of them were killed and many others are still
listed as missing. But no memorial has ever been established for them,” says
Abbasi. In fact, the records of the Palestinian volunteers, along with much of
their personal archives and papers, have disappeared, much of it lost in the
War of Independence.
Over the last few
years, Abbasi was able to learn of their story in Palestinian newspapers from
the Mandate era, in memoirs and personal journals, and through interviews he conducted
with a few of the last remaining volunteers who are still alive. He also
collected material from various British archives, from the Zionist Archive, and
the archives of the Haganah and the IDF.
Abbasi estimates that about 12,000
young Palestinians enlisted in the British Army in World War II. Hundreds
became POWs, many others (the exact figure is unknown) were killed. “Compared
to other peoples, this is not an insignificant number,” he says, and also
points out that, unlike other groups, the Palestinians volunteered for the
British Army from the first stage of the war.
Initially,
the Palestinian and Jewish volunteers served in mixed units. “They received
training and drilled at the same bases and in many instances fought shoulder to
shoulder, and were also taken prisoner together,” says Abbasi. And as reported
here two years ago, the proximity of the Jewish and Palestinian fighters
sometimes led to unusual outcomes, as in the case of Shehab Hadjaj, a
Palestinian who enlisted in the British Army, was taken prisoner in Germany and
died in 1943. To this day, he is listed at Mount Herzl as “a casualty of
Israel’s wars” because someone mistakenly thought his surname indicated that he
was Jewish.
“Relations
among the fighters were generally good, and if there was any friction it was
mainly over service conditions, like mail and food,” Abbasi says. However,
there were certain key differences between the two groups, too. For example,
while the Jews were united in their goal of fighting the Nazis to promote the
establishment of the Jewish state, the Palestinians “had no clear national
agenda,” Abbasi writes. For this reason, unlike the Jews, they did not seek to
form separate Palestinian units and there was no “Palestinian Brigade” parallel
to the Jewish Brigade, in which thousands of Jews from Mandatory Palestine
served.
So who were the Palestinians who
volunteered for the British Army to fight the Nazis? Abbasi says they mostly
came from the Palestinian elite and that, contrary to what many think,
represented “an important and central part of the Palestinian public.” A part
of the public that believed it was necessary to stand by Britain at this time,
and to temporarily put aside the Palestinian national aspirations – akin to the
Jewish idea to “fight Hitler as if there were no White Paper, and fight the
White Paper as if there were no Hitler.”
They
did this at a time when the Mufti of Jerusalem had left Palestine for exile in
the Arab countries and Europe, where he met with Hitler and congratulated the
Muslim volunteers of the Free Arab Legion – an Arab unit established in the
army of Nazi Germany. “He left Palestine for a decade in 1937. What kind of
leader abandons his people at such a time?” Abbasi wonders. “He had no
influence on the public. He was detached and the public was already tired of
him and his methods. They didn’t see him as a leader,” he says. “Anyone who
says differently is distorting history,” he adds in a not so subtle dig at
certain politicians.
In
his research, he documented pro-British propaganda conferences that were held
from 1940 on in Abu Dis (next to Jerusalem),
in Jenin, in villages in the Nablus area, in Tul Karm and in Lod. Among the
supporters of Britain’s fight against the Nazis were the mayors of Nablus and Gaza. Radio Palestine broadcast the comments of
an Egyptian writer who said, “The war is between the lofty and humane values
represented by England and the forces of darkness represented by the Nazis.”
Motivations for
volunteering were varied. “Some did it for ideological reasons, out of
opposition to the Nazi ideology and loyalty to the British and the values that
they represented,” says Abbasi. This motivation was common among upper middle
class and highly educated Palestinian volunteers from urban backgrounds. Rural
Palestinians were motivated largely by financial reasons. “And there were also
those who were seeking adventure and wanted a chance to travel abroad,” he says.
Abbasi found that some Palestinian
women also volunteered to fight the Nazis. Almost 120 young women did so as
part of the Auxiliary Territorial Service, the women’s branch of the British
Army, alongside Jewish women. A British recruiting poster in Arabic, published
in the Falastin newspaper in January 1942, read: “She couldn’t stop thinking
about contribution and sacrifice, she felt ongoing pride and exaltation of
spirit – when she did what she saw as her sacred duty for her nation and its
sons. When your country is crying out to you and asking for your service, when
your country makes it plain that our Arab men need your love and support, and
when your country reminds you of how cruel the enemy is – when your country is
calling you, can you stand by and do nothing?”
Abbasi
is one of the only researchers in Palestinian society who is studying this
area, which was also the subject of a 2015 article by Dalia Karpel in Haaretz Magazine. He came
to it thanks to his maternal grandfather, Sa’id Abbasi, who was one of the
volunteers in the British Army during the war. “The family didn’t talk about
it, until one day when I asked my grandmother why there was such a big age difference
between her children,” he says. “Her answer was: ‘Don’t remind me of the time
your grandfather left me for so many years.’” Abbasi decided to find out more
about that time, and came to see that his family story was part of his people’s
history.
In
the future, he hopes, the original material he has collected will be developed
into a book that, for the first time, will tell the optimistic story of a rare
moment in history in which Jews and Palestinians joined forces for a lofty
shared goal.
Ofer Aderet
https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/When-Palestinian-Arabs-and-Jews-fought-the-Nazis-side-by-side-592200
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-historian-12-000-palestinians-fought-for-u-k-in-wwii-alongside-jewish-volunteers-1.7309369
Ofer Aderet
https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/When-Palestinian-Arabs-and-Jews-fought-the-Nazis-side-by-side-592200
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-historian-12-000-palestinians-fought-for-u-k-in-wwii-alongside-jewish-volunteers-1.7309369
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
ARON TAUB & VIKTOR FEIGIN from Spain civil war to execution in Finland
Taub Aron
16.05.1910 Tallinn – 26.07.1941 Soome
16.05.1910 Tallinn – 26.07.1941 Soome
Autor: Sune Sahlstedt (ajaloolane) EestiExpress(03.05.2006)
30. juunil 1941 heideti lennukilt kaks eestimaalast Hämeenlinna lähedale Kalvolasse. Need olid tallinlane Aron Taub ja viljandlane Hans Karu. Taub, kes võeti peaaegu kohe kinni, oli 31aastane karusnahaäri omaniku poeg ja oli jõudnud ametit õppida mitmel pool Euroopas.Karu oli Taubiga ühevanune, kuid tema võeti kinni alles nädal hiljem Hattulas.Nad kuulati põhjalikult üle ning kulus üle kolme nädala, enne kui välikohus neile 26. juulil surmaotsuse langetas.Kolm nädalat pärast vangistamist polnud sõjaväeametnikud veel kindlad, kas Taub, keda hoiti kinni Hämeenlinna vanglas, on seadusevastane võitleja või mitte. Protokollides rõhutatakse, et ta on juudi päritolu. Kui surmaotsus oli lõpuks langetatud, hukati mõlemad mehed Ojoisis, paar kilomeetrit Hämeenlinnast põhja pool, kus vanglal oli taimeaed.
Tel +358503590495S. K. Sahlstedt, Klintensintie 5802400, Kirkkonummi
sune.sahlstedt@luukku.com
Kultuur ja Elu 1/2007 Kagebiidid ja ohvrid
...
On märgatav jõukamate juutide soov istuda kahel toolil, eriti alates 1934. või 1936. aastast, lastes poegadel aegsasti punaseks minna, et säästa vanemaid. Okupandid võtsid neid kõhklevalt, aga väliselt meelsasti vastu – oskasid eesti keelt, tundsid kohalikke olusid. Neid kasutati RO-s, miilitsas, julgeolekus, parteitööl. Kõige edukama karjääri tegi Pika Hermanni tornist 21. juunil Eesti riigilipu maha tõmmanud Leo Aisenstadt, saades rahanduse rahvakomissari asetäitjaks, tema isale kuulunud majad jäid natsionaliseerimata.Ei natsionaliseeritud ka Aron Taubi isale kuulunud maja Viru tn 7.) Oleks liiast nõukogude arhiivipaberitest loota leida jälgi sellest, mida Taub tegi residendi või agendina. Igatahes tegi seda vabatahtlikult, sest sõdis Hispaanias hästi, tõusis ruttu reamehest leitnandiks ja sealt kapteniks; õppis selgeks diversanditöö, astus Hispaania kommunistlikku parteisse ja sedakaudu oli 1940 siin juba samuti parteilane. 1940. suvel peab petutöökohta Tervishoiu rahvakomissariaadis 1. eriosakonna juhataja asetäitjana ja mobilisatsiooniosakona inspektorina.
Oma hiigelkorteri täitmiseks võttis Natalitš Taubilt igasuguse raha ja allkirjata 8 pehmet tooli, 3 lauda ja kirjutuslaua, puhveti, peegelkapi, trümoopeegli, tugitooli, kusheti, kaks lühtrit ja lõpetuseks kaks suurt õlimaali. Narva maantee konspiratiivkorteri sisustamiseks loovutas Taub oma Wilmsi tänava korterist diivani, 2 tugitooli, 4 pehmet tooli, lühtri ja laua. (Märkus: Aron Taubi lõpp on mõistatuslik. Saksa okupatsiooni aegse Eesti Julgeolekupolitsei ja SD Tallinna B IV osakonna Era-sse jõudnud hajapaberites (ERA, R-64, n 1, s 126) on säiliku erinevatesse osadesse sattunud nimekiri 4 lehel pealkirjaga “Soomes langevarjuga alla hüpanud eestlaste nimestik!” Selles on 46 nime ja kõige esimesena hüppasid 30. juunil 1941 (NB! Jätkusõja 4. päeval; Saksa-Vene sõja 9. päeval) Aron Taub ja keegi H. Karu. Soomlased andsid kinnipüütud diversandid sõjakohtu alla, enamik lasti maha; Taub 26. juulil 1941.
“Eesti rahva kannatuste aastas” (Tln, 1943, 1. Kd, lk 98) on seda lugu mainitud seoses langevarjumehe Viktor Feigini tabamisega Soomes; kättesaadavates Soome jätkusõda käsitlevates raamatutes seda episoodi ei mainita. Taubi isikut kõrvale jättes tuleb imestusega küsida, kuis nii ruttu täiesti tavalisi tsiviliste diversantideks koolitati? Isegi langevarju selgeks õppimiseks kulus rohkem aega. Või oli tegu mingi varasema plaaniga ja õigus Viktor Suvorovil (“Jäälõhkuja: kes alustas Teist maailmasõda”; Tln, 2000)? Või on ERA-sse maandunud paber üks võlts asi? Kuid kuhu jäi siis Aron Taub, sest Saksa okupatsiooni ajal mõrvatute nimestikus teda pole. Igatahes pidi tema kommunistlikku entusiasmi vähendama kokkupuutumine tegelikkuse ja Natalitši-taolise tegelasega, seepärast otsustaski alata uut lehekülge?) ...
Viktor Feigin
27.06.1910 Pihkva – 17.07.1941 Soome
27.06.1910 Pihkva – 17.07.1941 Soome
in Tallinn in 30_is, was local jewish sport activist.
As many others, Taub was dropped not far from Hämeenlinna in 30.6.41 for sabotage-diversion tasks, was immediately apprehended and delivered to police by locals. No pics seen yet.
The same of Viktor Feigin, cought in Sääksmäki. That both were jews was an issue for interrogators.
After few weeks they were facing the firing squad.
The same of Viktor Feigin, cought in Sääksmäki. That both were jews was an issue for interrogators.
After few weeks they were facing the firing squad.
from: "Suomen sotien valokuvat" - https://www.sotasampo.fi/fi/photographs/page/sakuva_87061
Feigin as caught 01.07.1941
Sääksmäki, Finland
The policeman Sergeant Toivonen and the farm mistress Parila in the place where Feigin surrendered
with Finnish police/army on the background
equipment
for how long it would last ?
СУДАК - zander in tomato, latvian bakon, sausage, undefined wite package...
СУДАК - zander in tomato, latvian bakon, sausage, undefined wite package...
looks some moments before execution, with cigarette, dressed different.
Wartime Finnish execution
The same in color
The same in color
in Spain civil war
with the armband RO of workers militia.
1940.
sitting on right with comrades of workers militia.
tallinn 1940.
Thursday, May 2, 2019
Veckorevy - Weekly view 1944-08-21
Estonia has had a large Swedish population living in the islands and coastal area since the 13th century. During the Second World War, this area, was first invaded by Soviets through the Molotov Ribbentrop deal, and then, in summer 1941 by Germany. In the autumn of 1943, the German authorities granted Sweden permission to make a transfer of 780 old and sick Estonian Swedes. A government committee, "The Committee of Estonian Swedes", was formed to administer the transfer. After prolonged negotiations with the German authorities, in the spring of 1944, it was granted permission to transport the remaining Estonian Swedes to Sweden. The Estonian schooner "Juhan" hired for the transport made a total of nine trips in 1944. The last transport went on September 18 with a small boat, "Triina", from Tallinn. In total, 3335 Estonian Swedes came to Sweden with these boats. About the same number came on their own in various boats. Between 1940 and 1944, a total of 7,000 Estonian Swedes, 25,000 estonians, 4000 latvians and 500 lithuanians came. The great escape from the Baltics is the first major refugee wave to Sweden in modern times. Most refugees came across the Baltic Sea to Gotland or to Stockholm's Archipelago and were quarantined there because of infectious diseases in the war-torn areas. After the time in quarantine, most were sent to work within Swedish forestry and agriculture. The film is a unique document that shows the ship "Juhan" under the Nazi flag with estonian sweds ,arrives to Sweden and their recovery on Sabbatsberg.
http://www.filmarkivet.se/movies/veckorevy-1944-08-21/
Friday, April 19, 2019
Fit, bright, not too Jewish - Kindertransport policy for which children to save from the Nazis revealed
Children seeking sanctuary in Britain before the Holocaust were refused the lifeline of the Kindertransport if they were thought to have disabilities or looked too Jewish, say researchers.
Historian Louise London, who has written about Britain’s immigration policies at the time, said that it was “the Jewishness of Jewish refugees” that was seen as “particularly problematic”.
Speaking at a conference on Monday organised by the Association of Jewish Refugees to mark the 80th anniversary of the Kindertransport, Dr London said it was thought that Jewish children separated from their parents “would be less visibly Jewish” and, once dispersed into British families, “over time they would be, as was often said, ‘Anglicised,’ hastening their assimilation.”
She added that the “problem of what to do with the Jews took precedence over efforts to save them”.
One document featuring details of a 15-year-old refugee from Vienna, Kitty Milch, stated she was “an intelligent looking and not particularly Jewish young woman”.
Professor Paul Weindling of Oxford Brookes University, who has studied letters sent by the Kindertransport office in London and organisations applying to accept refugee children, said it was also common for people to request “non-Orthodox” children so that, it was thought, they could be more easily integrated.
“People were specifically requesting what type of child they would like.”
Medical certificates issued to children at the time guaranteed that they were “fit for work” and confirmed that there was “no record of family illness, disability, or poor mental health”.
He said he knew of a case of one child having to travel to the Nazi medical centre in Vienna to get her certificate. “You can only imagine how scared she would have been,” he said. “Others failed and were rejected.”
Children who were rejected often ended up dead, he said.
Fourteen-year-old Eva Renee Seinfeld wrote to Princess Elizabeth from Vienna appealing for help in July 1939, but by that point the number of children coming to Britain from the city had shrunk to 291.
“May it please your Royal Highness to grant my request in assisting my great despair and to make it possible to come over to England,” she wrote.
“I am of a quiet and modest kind, of a good and severe education and it will be my greatest endeavour to be worthy of your noble and kind protection.”
She was deported from Vienna in 1942 and died in Sobibor.
Heinrich Steinberger applied to be reunited with his father who was in Kitchener camp near Sandwich, Kent, in August 1939, but by that point the number of children granted permission was down to 195.
Mr Steinberger, whose mother had a domestic permit to work in Britain, was not successful. Records show he was deported from Vienna in 1942 and died in Sobibor.
Prof Weindling found that mental and physical characteristics were often referred to in the correspondence. He said the head of the main Kindertransport organiser in the UK, the Movement for the Care of Children from Germany, requested children who were “bright,” “physically fit” and possessed “exceptional qualities”.
He said: “They were specifically looking for intelligent, healthy children, possessing positive moral qualities and specifically stated that they did not want those who were mentally or physically disabled.”
He also gave the example of Hans Lang, born in 1932 in Vienna and in the care of the Jewish Boys Orphanage. He was described on an application as “very well behaved but very slightly mentally backward.” His application was rejected by the Kindertransport office in London and his fate was unclear.
Prof Weindling said organisations which funded the Kindertransport sought to ensure that none of the refugees would become a financial burden on the public, as well as applying pressure for children to be selected based on their intellect and appearance.
He said 2142 children were sent to Britain from Vienna between December 1938 and August 1939 but after the 851 sent in December, numbers massively decreased.
Children were often required to produce medical and school certificates and social workers were instructed to carry out home visits to ensure each child’s suitability, his research shows.
Officials in Vienna received “frequent requests” for orphans, because host families in Britain wanted to take in young children.
Dr London said there was an “obvious” tension at the time between British government policy, which was that children brought over should re-emigrate, and the desires of “foster-parents for a child that would become a permanent member of their family.”
She said: “The government made no effort to resolve these ambiguities.”
Every child was required a guarantee of £50 to finance their eventual re-emigration as it was assumed at the time that the danger was temporary, and the children would return to their families when it was safe.
“Without their parents the children were acceptable here,” Dr London said.
According to Dr London, author of Whitehall and the Jews, it was thought that “if some were ultimately allowed to remain, they could contribute good white stock to the population at a time when the birth rate was low.”
Prof Weindling said the research deconstructs the “myth” of the Kindertransport as an unproblematic rescue mission.
Children often took it upon themselves to apply to be let into Britain. Prof Weindling said it was an example of the initiative they had to show at the time but not everyone would have been able to express the same tenacity.
For example Otto Hutter, who was 15, enrolled himself on the Kindertransport in December 1938, the month the first Kindertransport from Vienna departed.
Mr Hutter recalled how he joined a short queue of accompanied children and was interviewed by officials.
“Regardless of my having presented myself without a parent, I was enrolled because - as I learned much later - boys nearly 15 years old were given priority lest they be soon sent to forced labour camps.”
Mr Hutter said he was made to undergo a medical examination before being issued with documents for his parents to sign and was sent away with a list of clothing to pack into a small case.
A letter written by Mr Hutter recalled: “I was issued with an identification number printed on a card to be worn around the neck when joining the transport due to leave in less than a week’s time. My number was 359. Just 360 children were enrolled that day. So I had made it just in the nick of time.”
Hella Pick, journalist and Kindertransportee who arrived in Britain in March 1939, said there was a lack of awareness around the conditions placed on refugees at the time and more needed to be learnt.
Ms Pick, who was as born in Vienna, Austria, into a middle class Jewish family, said researching her own story and the process in which she arrived had been a “rapid” learning experience.
“It has made me realise how fortunate we were to be selected. Had we come from some other background we might not be sitting here,” she said.
She said strict restrictions on refugees were “sadly” symptomatic of the country’s current “attitude to immigration”.